Denise Douglas continues to assert sovereignty on the behalf of the Pilalt people to resist governments attempts of criminalizing native fishers for practicing their traditional way of life on unceded land. Native fishers do not need a license to fish and should not be criminalized or ticketed for fishing. The DFO should not be telling Native fishers what to do, they have no juristiction on land the Pilalt people have been living on as a way of life prior to european settlers. If these laws were created with the intention of conserving the fish it would be the big commercial fishing ships to be targetted as a concern. Given the rules and regulations currently in effect it seems evident that the government is attempting to continue forced assimilation just like the residential schools functioned as taking Native people away from their culture and way of life. Native fishers should not be regulated on when they fish because those fish will not go to waste as they are dispersed amongst the community. Come support Pilalt fishers as they argue that they do not deserve this treatment and the DFO should have no juristiction on their territory.

Pilalt fisherwoman won’t get a license from DFO.

And she won’t play by the provincial court’s rules, either

by The St’át’imc Runner

Here comes the DFODFO stealing
Here comes the DFO                                            DFO stealing

Upside down flagsDFO team on boat
Upside Down Flags                                              DFO Team
Set nettingOff to catch more fishers
Set netting                                                               Off to catch more fishers
Drying rack
Drying rack

Denise Douglas is in court for fishing “without the authority of a license.” It’s not the first time. “I’ve never had a fishing license,” says the Cheam Member, who considers herself more authentically to be Pilalt – one of the original five Sto:lo tribes. One of the charges against her, July 16, 2002, was made at her family’s ancestral fishing rock near Yale. That exact rock was noted by Simon Fraser in 1808 in his journey down- river. At that time there was a large plank house on top of the rock.

The trial will be argued over jurisdiction, aboriginal title, and aboriginal rights. At this stage the defenses span the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Section 35 of the Constitution, and international human rights statutes.

Douglas will be representing herself for the first time. In other court cases she has been in court since 1985 on successive charges she has had a lawyer. Along with her sister, also charged, she will represent herself, two nephews and a cousin in the same trial. More than a dozen Cheam Members were part of the same Crown action, but only five remain. Others pled guilty in order to be rid of the whole situation.

All five of the defendants are on bail during the case, and all have already been in prison for failing to report properly under the terms of their bail. Conditions of bail include not fishing without a license.

“We have to fish. We need the fish to supplement our food supply.” Court is not back in session until September 13. Accepting a DFO licenses would compromise the position being taken in court, which is that neither DFO nor the court has any jurisdiction. “We are sovereign. In this case, we are claiming our sovereignty as Pilalt, so Cheam as an Indian Band may even be in trespass.”

Working with anthropologist Keith Carlson from the University of Saskatchewan, Douglas states she has evidence that places her people in the lower Fraser Valley since the end of the last ice age.

There are disagreements within the Band and at the Tribal Council level over the best way to practice traditional fisheries. “One thing I would like to bring forward is the lack of support from the big native organizations who receive the mega-bucks from government to do reconciliation work in the fisheries. Instead, at the local level, we’re already tried, convicted and hung.”

“I found out that Delgamuukw cost us $25 million. And here we are, going through these cases, arguing for our jurisdiction and our fisheries, and it isn’t costing anyone anything. Except the Crown, it’s their action.” Douglas is doing her own research for the case while working on a second degree at the University of the Fraser Valley.

Judge Crabtree has already stated that he will not make a declaration of title, and that he is assum- ing the Crown has title. “I need to refer to that comment, but he won’t let me have the transcripts.” The Douglas defendants are collecting up incidences of irregularity for a case they have planned down the road.

“If you look at what it says in the International Charter of Rights, we are not being treated like Canadians in these courts. But then we’re not really Canadians, we’re Registered Indians.” Douglas spoke of what that difference means; how Cheam has become ghettoized by colonization, how six police cars come at once for a single person who has failed to report to their parole officer – over a fishing charge; and how procedural irregularities are “salient details: they waited a full two years to chase us down gangland-style with a summons for these charges, days before the statutory limitation.”

“We were raised by our Elders, my sister and brother and I. We were trained by the Elders to do what we do: to defend our fish from anybody. Our Elders were out there on the river when DFO had gunner boats to patrol us, boats with machine guns attached to the bow.
“Now DFO and the RCMP sign deals about enforcing us on the river. Last month they had a supper to sign the deal, and our Band paid for their dinner, and at the same time the Canadian Forces gave the RCMP two tanks – one for Agassiz and one for Chiliwack. I was scared when I read about it.”

The court case is in year six with only three days of trial so far, last May. If the defense was going by current court precedents, Douglas would have to prove an aboriginal right, show prima facie infringement of that right, and force the crown to jus- tify their actions. The legality of DFO regulating by fishing licenses, arbitrarily, has been tested and they have been found to have that authority in other cases. “But we know now that they can’t say, ‘because you didn’t use your rights for a minute, they’re gone;’ or, ‘if you’re not sitting on that fish rock 24/7, 3-6-5, as soon as you leave you lose your title and someone else can discover it.”

What this case seeks is recognition, in the court- room, that neither the judge nor the plaintiffs, in this case the federal government, have any right to be there making demands on sovereign Pilalt people on their own lands. “They never perfected a treaty with us. They do have a Constitution and laws, and those are good. They work well for the people they were written for. And their courts are like a chess board, everyone with their own moves and capabilities. But for us, as Pilalt, we don’t have a starting place in that courtroom. If they’re saying we’re playing as Canadians, I challenge that: we’re registered Indians. When we play as Canadians, that’s when we get messed around.”

“I told them, without proof of title, he doesn’t have jurisdiction to treat us like criminals in a provincial court house.

“I’ve filed a writ of Mandamus in the Supreme Court. After this case, we’re planning a class action suit with the complaint of genocide, because we’re sick of it.”

Douglas and others, including Wolverine from Secwepemc, are planning a Dialogue on Fisheries in Cheam on September 11.

Interview with Kerry Coast

Posted by: lifealongtheriver | May 15, 2010

Cheam Court Support May 25th-27th

Posted by: lifealongtheriver | March 15, 2010

Get ready to rumble! Court Support Needed! May 25-27th 2010

The ongoing battle between the Cheam band, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and ultimately the Canadian State is continuing May 25th at 9:30 am in the Chilliwack Court House. Denise Douglas will be defending the remaining six defendents and we are calling on all supporters to mobilize and show the courts that the people of Cheam are not alone in their struggle. Transport and billeting from Vancouver to Chilliwack/Cheam will be arranged. If enough people are interested we will be renting a bus to transport everyone. There will be an option of staying at the community hall in Cheam for the three days.

Please email supportcheam@gmail.com if you wish to guarantee a ride out to the courts May 25th, 2010. We will post more info about the trip soon.

Mt. CheamThis land was never bought, traded or ceded!!

Support Indigenous Land Defenders!!

Posted by: lifealongtheriver | March 14, 2010

Cheam argues indigenous sovereignty in court – March 9th Report back

Several indigenous people from the Cheam reserve of the Pilalt/Sto:lo people appeared in court in Chilliwack, British Columbia, to face charges related to defiance of government fishing regulations and to present evidence of their sovereign indigenous right to fish. Several people from Vancouver, indigenous and supporters, travelled to Chilliwack to show support and build solidarity, which the Cheam people said they appreciated.

One person from Cheam was taken into custody in the court room in the morning on another fishing charge and was to be released on probation and conditional discharge afterwards.

Evidence was presented by a Cheam member, without the presence of a lawyer, of indigenous traditions, family ties and teachings handed down through the generations regarding fishing in the area. The immensely destructive impact of residential schools on indigenous traditions was also presented.

A solidarity message from people of the Katzie reserve and information on their salmon sovereignty blockade of the Golden Ears Bridge on February 13 as part of the anti-Olympic convergence was also shared with the Cheam people at the courthouse and was well received.

The judge put the trial over to May 25, setting aside three days for evidence to be presented by Cheam members. More support and solidarity then is requested.

Posted by: lifealongtheriver | March 8, 2010

Requesting Court Support March 9th

Categories